Hawaiian Kingdom Records No. 2014-0908 - Matters of the Treaty which supersedes State Laws, Title of Kekauonohi
| |||||||||||||
Inbox
| x |
|
10:38 AM (0 minutes ago)
| | ||
![[Kanaka Maoli flag]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/proxy/AVvXsEjAZaeae2XqcOMB8EqamFqafO-1l6zPz9Um8fBvgWabj0rYA1-Gy1th0QuNwlM2LV1Lshn3m_s8LSBTu_LK3QSc5oPk5k52d-YCxw_7GzC208N6jRUGl6sOJEARjB7NDvzc4OzMhyD4-aEarx11b1DwBw=s0-d-e1-ft)
President Barack Obama
Secretary of State - John Kerry
Judges, et. als. in the Hawaiian Islands
Greetings,
On August 20, 2014, the Tribunal of the Hawaiian Kingdom met and determined that 35 individuals were guilty of " murder, piracy,arson, robbery, forgery or the utterance of forged paper,committed within the jurisdiction of either," as documented under the treaty.
The list included James Campbell, Sanford Ballard Dole, et. als.
On August 29, 2014, the Tribunal of the Hawaiian Kingdom met and determined that 49 additional individuals were guilty of " murder, piracy,arson, robbery, forgery or the utterance of forged paper,committed within the jurisdiction of either," as documented under the treaty.
The list included Charles Reed Bishop, et. als.
To date, 84 people have been declared Guilty under the treaty of 1850.
The ramifications are that their criminal claims are no more. They no longer own any interest in the Hawaiian Islands because the Royal Families, the heirs of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, et. als. exists.
More Tribunal Meetings will be held for those who have committed crimes against our Hawaiian people whose ancestors maintained a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation amid genocide activities committed by current Governor Abercrombie, et. als.
Discussion:
Hawaiian Kingdom Tribunal - 2014
The members of the Tribunal includes Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's heirs and successors: John Gora, Amelia Gora, Calvin Santos, and Christine Kakalia.
Kekauonohi/Miriam Kekauonohi's Lands, Her Heirs, etc.:
Pirates documented by the Hawaiian Kingdom Tribunal in August 2014:
James Campbell was Number 2 on the list of Pirates.
James Campbell received lands of Kekauonohi from Anaderia Amoe, Levi Haalelea et. als.
Genealogy, Land Owner's Facts:
Kekauonohi was the step-mother of all of the Kamehameha's because of her first marriage to Liholiho - Kamehameha II.
Kekauonohi also married one of Kaumualii - King of Kauai's children - named Aaron Kealiiahonui. Kaumualii married Kamehameha's widow Kaahumanu who was also the step-mother of all of Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha's children, step-children, and hanai. Kaahumanu married Keliiahonui/ Aaron Kealiiahonui who married Kekauonohi/Miriam Kekauonohi. Keliiahonui/Aaron Kealiiahonui became the step-father of all of Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha's, Kaumualii's children, step-children, and hanai.
Kekauonohi/Miriam Kekauonohi married Levi Haalelea, a non-Kamehameha descendant/heir and who was entitled to only a life interest after his wife Kekauonohi/Miriam Kekauonohi died. (See Laws of 1846)
Kekauonohi died on June 2, 1851. Her heirs included all of Kamehameha's descendants/heirs which included Kauikeaouli - Kamehameha III, ancestor of John Francis Gora, et. als.
Kekauonohi was an heir of Kalaimoku/Kalanimoku, the father of W.P. Leleiohoku as well as the step-father of all of Kamehameha's children, step-children, and hanai children due to his marriage to Keopuolani the mother of Kauikeaouli-Kamehameha III, ancestor of John Francis Gora, Nahienaena (w) Liholiho-Kamehameha II and step-mother of all of Kamehameha's children, step-children and hanai.
Haalelea /Levi Haalelea married Kekauonohi on November 6, 1849 in Honolulu, file no. 0-32:78.
One of Kekauonohi's/Miriam Kekauonohi's heirs died, his name: Kauikeaouli-Kamehameha III, ancestor of John Francis Gora, et. als., on December 15, 1854.
Defining Some of the Multiple Relationship/Heirship/
1) Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III, ancestor of John Francis Gora, et. als, - His relationship to her was sister-in-law (she married his brother Liholiho/Kamehameha II),
2) Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III's, ancestor of John Francis Gora, et. als., step-mother because she was married to Liholiho/Kamehameha II who had seven (7) wives, and one wife was one of the widows of Kamehameha.
Her name was Kekauluohi/ Auhea.
She was the step-mother to all of Kamehameha's children, step-children, and hanai.
3) Kekauonohi/ Miriam Kekauonohi was a niece of Kauikeaouli - Kamehameha III, ancestor of John Francis Gora, et. als., because her father was his brother.
His name was Kinau.
4) Kekauonohi/Miriam Kekauonohi was also a sister to Kauikeaouli - Kamehameha III, ancestor of John Francis Gora, et. als., because her hanai father Kalaimoku/ Kalanimoku was married to Keopuolani, mother of Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III, ancestor of John Francis Gora, et. als.
Kekauonohi/Miriam Kekauonohi's brother was W.P. Leleiohoku.
Our families genealogies were entered in the First Circuit Court Case Civil Case No. 09-1-1074-05 RMS Trustees under the "Will of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Deceased, also known as Kamehameha Schools, Plaintiffs, vs. Jeffery and Kerea Kupu Esera-Vargas, Defendants, & Amelia Gora, Francis Keoua Gora, respondents filed October 22, 2012
Kalaimoku/Kalanimoku's last wife was Akahi (w) ancestor of John Gora.
Mahi/Mahihelelima was the sibling of Kanekapolei who married Kalaniopuu, Kamehameha, and Kuuku.
Mahi/Mahihelelima was the kahu of Kaahumanu, Kaheiheimalie, and Namahana/Piia - three (3) wives of Kamehameha.
Mahi/Mahihelelima's son was Nuuanu who married Kanekapolei 2 and had Kikau/Kiikau.
Kikau/Kiikau married Akahi (w), step-mother of all of Kamehameha's children, step-children, and hanai because of her marriage to Kalaimoku/Kalanimoku. Kikau and Akahi(w) had Nahuina who married Kamaliiwahine/Kaili (w). They had Kaluakini who was a hanai of his own grandmother Akahi(w).
Kaluakini married Haili /Kaili/Kalama (w) and had Elikapeka Kaimiola who married Joseph Gora and had John Gora, et. als. John Gora married Mary Castro, Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III's descendant/heir and had John Francis Gora, et. als.
The genealogy line of Mahihelelima to Nuuanu (married to Kamehameha's daughter Kanekapolei) to Kikau to Nahuina to Kaluakini to Elikapeka Kaimiola Kaluakini to John Gora to his children including John Francis Gora was verified by the State of Hawaii genealogist Kanai Kapeliela for the Oahu Burial Council due to claims in Waikiki, Oahu burials reinterred in Kapiolani Park.
Kalaimoku/Kalanimoku's brother was Keoua who married Kalaniopuu's daughter, who became Kamehameha's step-daughter named Puali Nui was the mother of Luluhiwalani who had Alapai Kahekili Luluhiwalani who had Ioela who married Abigaila/Kapooloku (Kaumualii's grand-daughter) and had Haili (w) who married Kaluakini (Kamehameha's descendant/heir) and had Elikapeka Kaimiola Kaluakini who married Joseph Gora and had John Gora who married Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III's descendant/heir Mary Castro and had John Francis Gora, et. als.
There are no less than five(5) claims of ownership to lands under the name of Kekauonohi/Miriam Kekauonohi declared here.
Kauikeaouli - Kamehameha III signed the Permanent Friendship Treaty with the United States of America in 1850.
Levi Haalelea married Amoe (w) on January 19, 1858 in Hilo, Record No. H-14a, p. 29.
Levi Haalelea died on October 3, 1864.
Levi Haalelea's widow proceeded to have Probate of Kekauonohi/ Miriam Kekauonohi be made.
Court Proceedings for Miriam Kekauonohi/Kekauonohi was documented on August 9, 1867 or 16 years AFTER she died.
Reference: Probate 2081 (First Circuit Court) "Microfilm has "Court Proceedings August 9, 1867" proof of will, but nothing further. - Noted by Dorothy Barrere in her book THE KING'S MAHELE.
The true owners existed then and their descendants/heirs exist today including John Francis Gora, et. als.
The Court, the banks/banker's representatives have been informed about the Treaty(ies) previously. In this case, the wrong doers namely James Campbell, Levi Haalelea and Amoe (w) were listed. Levi Haalelea lost all interests in Kekauonohi's/Miriam Kekauonohi when he married Amoe (w). Haalelea failed the laws of heirship of 1846 when he remarried.
President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry has also been informed through e-mails and U.S. Postal Services certified return receipt requested mailings.
Last, the Banks in the Hawaiian Islands are perpetuating fraud, corruption, piracy(ies), racketeering etc. and producing false documentation in claiming ownership to lands.
The Banks /representatives in this case will have to obtain their fees from the Title Company of record who failed to produce an accurate Title of ownership in a Monarchy Government/Constitutional Monarchy Government, utilizing ano alodio/alodio titles which is not the same as American Laws.
The Banks/representatives are corporations who are Not related to our families, families made up of living, human beings who have the bloodlines of Kalaniopuu, Kamehameha, Kamehameha III, Kaumualii, et. als.
The Banks/representatives are viewed as Pirates, Racketeers, etc. documented as pushing illegal contracts, etc.
Early banker Charles Reed Bishop, et. als. have also been documented as Pirates, etc. as with James Campbell which affects some of the banks that are currently in the news:
"The defendants include Bank of America Corp. (BAC), Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Barclays PLC (BCS), HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC), Deutsche Bank AG (DB), The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS), Credit Suisse Group AG (CS), Morgan Stanley (MS), The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (RBS), BNP Paribas SA (BNPQY) and UBS AG (UBS).
Other defendants included the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) – a trade group for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market – and Markit Group Ltd, a London-based financial-information company."
A reminder to all that the 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America is in effect due to the Permanent Friendship, etc. documented by our ancestor, Kauikeaouli - Kamehameha III for his heirs and successors:
Under the U.S. Constitution, the following applies:
"Article. VI.
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
aloha.
U.S. Constitution http://www.
|
Statute Laws of His Majesty Kamehameha III, King of the ...
Hawaii, John Ricord. Government Press, 1846 - Hawaii ... All such persons shall be amenable to the laws of this kingdom as native subjects. All persons born ...
The Hawaiian Kingdom has the "Most favored nation" status:
Source: http://www.zacks.com/
In contract law[edit]
A most favoured nation clause (also called a most favoured customer clause or most favoured licensee clause) is a contract provision in which a seller (or licensor) agrees to give the buyer (or licensee) the best terms it makes available to any other buyer (or licensee). In some contexts, the use of such clauses may become commonplace, such as when online ebook retailers contract with publishers for the supply of e-books.[11] Use of such clauses, in some contexts, may provoke concerns about anticompetitive influences and antitrust violations, while in other contexts, the influence may be viewed as procompetitive.[12]
One example where most favoured nation clauses may appear is in institutional investment advisory contracts, where if a certain number of conditions are met, one client may be entitled to the lowest fee offered to other clients with a substantially identical investment strategy and the same or lower level of assets under management.[13]
A commercial treaty is a formal agreement between states for the purpose of establishing mutual rights and regulating conditions of trade.
Reference: Wiki-Pedia
Perpetual Clauses:
"Article I
There shall be perpetual peace and amity between the United States and the King of the Hawaiian Islands, his heirs and his successors."
"Article XIV
The contracting parties mutually agree to surrender,upon official requisition, to the authority of each, all persons who, being charged with the crimes of murder, piracy,arson, robbery, forgery or the utterance of forged paper,committed within the jurisdiction of either, shall be found within the territories of the other; provided, that this shall only be done upon such evidence or criminality as, according to the laws of the place where the person so charged shall be found, would justify his apprehension and commitment for trial if the crime had there been committed: and the respective judges and other magistrates of the two Governments, shall have authority, upon complaint made under oath, to issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person do charged, that he may be brought before such judge or other magistrates respectively, to the end that the evidence of criminality may be heard and considered;and if, on such hearing, the evidence be deemed sufficient to sustain the charge, it shall be the duty of the examining judge or magistrate to certify the same to the proper executive authority, that a warrant may issued for the surrender of such fugitive. The expense of such apprehension and delivery shall be borne and defrayed by the party who makes the requisition and receives the fugitive."
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
12 Global Banks May Face Credit Default Swap Antitrust Suit – Analyst Blog
Monday, September 8, 2014 7:26
Adding to the existing litigation overhangs, several global banking giants may be hit by yet another lawsuit. On Thursday, in a consolidated case, US District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan dismissed certain claims against 12 banking giants. However, she stated that investors may pursue a lawsuit against the banks for artificially inflating prices and restricting competition in the credit default swaps (CDS) market, which constituted a violation of the U.S. antitrust law.
The $21 trillion (as of 2013) CDS market was under the scrutiny of U.S. and European regulators for potential anticompetitive activity. In Jul 2013, the European Commission accused many of the defendants of resorting to collusive arrangements to restrict the entry of new CDS exchanges in the market.
The defendants include Bank of America Corp. (BAC), Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Barclays PLC (BCS), HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC), Deutsche Bank AG (DB), The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS), Credit Suisse Group AG (CS), Morgan Stanley (MS), The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (RBS), BNP Paribas SA (BNPQY) and UBS AG (UBS).
Other defendants included the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) – a trade group for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market – and Markit Group Ltd, a London-based financial-information company.
Allegations
The plaintiffs of this case were a group of investors, including public pension fund, which traded CDS with the banks in 2008-2013 period. The allegations were converted into consolidated lawsuits in 2013. They alleged that the banks conspired to incapacitate the launch of a CDS exchange – Credit Market Derivatives Exchange (CMDX), which was being partly developed by Chicago-based CME Group Inc. (CME).
The banks were alleged to have worked collectively to not use new CDS exchanges and made arrangements with ISDA and Markit to not issue licenses to CMDX.
Owing to this, market participants were not able to make an efficient choice for non-dealers who wanted to trade the same CDS. The banks’ control over the CDS market resulted in higher transaction prices.
The Ruling in a Nutshell
Owing to lack of evidence, Cote dismissed investors’ claims of the bank’s collusive act for monopolized trading in the CDS market and certain other claims that have risen in autumn 2008. However, the remainder of the case can move forward where damages could amount to tens of billions of dollars.
The Manhattan federal judge, in her 49 page decision, said the plaintiffs could bring in a case against the banks for violating the Sherman Act, which led to payment of unfair prices on CDS trades in the above mentioned period, even when improved liquidity and standardization should have pushed costs lower.
Cote’s ruling stated the presence of evidence of the banks having arranged secret meetings, their decision to block rival CDS exchanges and their arrangement with ISDA and Markit. Her findings reflect conspiracy. Per the judge, “The complaint provides a chronology of behavior that would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence.”
Bottom Line
The global banking giants are encountering numerous lawsuits from charges ranging from soured mortgage loans to rigging of interest rates. The latest addition will further fuel their legal troubles. While regulators are striving to bring justice to affected investors and prevent further occurrence of such issues, we believe that it is high time that these banking behemoths realize that they cannot always find an easy escape to their wrong deeds.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
JPMORGAN CHASE (JPM): Free Stock Analysis Report
CREDIT SUISSE (CS): Free Stock Analysis Report
UBS AG (UBS): Free Stock Analysis Report
MORGAN STANLEY (MS): Free Stock Analysis Report
BARCLAY PLC-ADR (BCS): Free Stock Analysis Report
DEUTSCHE BK AG (DB): Free Stock Analysis Report
ROYAL BK SC-ADR (RBS): Free Stock Analysis Report
CITIGROUP INC (C): Free Stock Analysis Report
GOLDMAN SACHS (GS): Free Stock Analysis Report
BANK OF AMER CP (BAC): Free Stock Analysis Report
BNP PARIBAS-ADR (BNPQY): Get Free Report
HSBC HOLDINGS (HSBC): Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
JPMORGAN CHASE (JPM): Free Stock Analysis Report
CREDIT SUISSE (CS): Free Stock Analysis Report
UBS AG (UBS): Free Stock Analysis Report
MORGAN STANLEY (MS): Free Stock Analysis Report
BARCLAY PLC-ADR (BCS): Free Stock Analysis Report
DEUTSCHE BK AG (DB): Free Stock Analysis Report
ROYAL BK SC-ADR (RBS): Free Stock Analysis Report
CITIGROUP INC (C): Free Stock Analysis Report
GOLDMAN SACHS (GS): Free Stock Analysis Report
BANK OF AMER CP (BAC): Free Stock Analysis Report
BNP PARIBAS-ADR (BNPQY): Get Free Report
HSBC HOLDINGS (HSBC): Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
Source: http://www.zacks.com/
More References:
No comments:
Post a Comment